Evaluation of the safety profile in official drug information sources in Brazil, Europe and the United States

×

Error message

User warning: The following theme is missing from the file system: journalijdr. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1138 of /home2/journalijdr/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

International Journal of Development Research

Volume: 
10
Article ID: 
19478
5 pages
Research Article

Evaluation of the safety profile in official drug information sources in Brazil, Europe and the United States

Ítalo Assis Bezerra da Silva, Thiago Afonso Rodrigues Melo1, Renatha Tuanny Nicácio Borges, Aline de Fátima Bonetti, Cinthia Caldas Rios Soares, Wallace Entinger Bottacin, Thais Teles de Souza and Walleri Christini Torelli Reis

Abstract: 

In this study, the completeness of the information on adverse reactions and poisoning management contained in the package inserts of the ten drugs most involved in drug morbidity and mortality was assessed, according to the 36th Annual Report, published by the American Association of Poison Control Centers, in 2018. These sources of information were compared to those contained in the clinical database UpToDate®, on the same drugs. The data were collected through online access to the electronic portal of Brazilian regulatory agencies, the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA); from Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA); and the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In total, 26 inserts were collected, 8 Brazilian, 8 European and 10 American. The results of the present study indicate that the leaflets of ANVISA and EMA, when compared with those of the FDA and the information contained in UpToDate®, present a shortage in the supply of relevant information that can help the health professional to identify and quickly manage the situation and little applicability. However, those of ANVISA proved to be superior when compared to those of EMA, regarding the completeness of the information. Therefore, it is up to the regulatory agencies to invest in strategies that guarantee the improvement of the quality of the information contained in the information sources, as well as improve its applicability in clinical practice, to allow a quick decision making, and consequently reducing the risks of negative clinical outcomes.

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.19478.07.2020
Download PDF: