Implanon uptake and Determinants among family Planning clients at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa Nigeria
International Journal of Development Research
Implanon uptake and Determinants among family Planning clients at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa Nigeria
Received 19th October, 2025; Received in revised form 23rd November, 2025; Accepted 16th December, 2025; Published online 30th January, 2026
Copyright©2026, Atemie Gordon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Contraceptive use plays a vital role in reducing unintended and high-risk pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and consequently maternal morbidity and mortality. Implanon is a single-rod subdermal implant that provides long-acting reversible contraception for women. Aim: This study aimed to determine the uptake of Implanon and to assess the sociodemographic characteristics of users, previous contraceptive methods, reasons for choosing Implanon, and sources of information. Study Design: A descriptive retrospective study conducted among clients who accessed family planning services at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, over a three-year period from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2020. Results: During the study period, 1,281 clients attended the family planning clinic for contraception, of whom 95 chose Implanon, yielding an uptake rate of 7.4%. The mean age of Implanon users was 33.4 years (range: 20–49 years), with the highest proportion (32.6%) aged 30–34 years. Most users had at least secondary education (50.5%), while 28.4% attained tertiary education. Christians accounted for 95.8% of users, and uptake increased with increasing parity. Over half of the users (54.7%) had no prior contraceptive experience, whereas injectables were the most commonly used method among previous users (32.6%). Information about Implanon was predominantly obtained from clinic personnel (69.5%), and the primary reason for choosing the method was child spacing (68.4%). Conclusion: Implanon uptake was low and is influenced by educational status, with higher use among multiparouswomen in their third decade.