Management of waste of health services: study in two hospitals of microrregião do bico do Papagaio - Tocantins, Brazil

×

Error message

User warning: The following theme is missing from the file system: journalijdr. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1138 of /home2/journalijdr/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

International Journal of Development Research

Volume: 
08
Article ID: 
14021
5 pages
Research Article

Management of waste of health services: study in two hospitals of microrregião do bico do Papagaio - Tocantins, Brazil

Marcela de Oliveira Feitosa, Caio César Parente de Alencar Leal, Ana Maria da Costa Teixeira Carneiro, Maikon Chaves de Oliveira, Martin Dharlle Oliveira Santana, Catilena Silva Pereira, Lílian Natália Ferreira de Lima and Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca

Abstract: 

The Plan of Waste Management of Health Services (PGRSS) can minimize the risks of work accidents and provide greater security to the hospital community, the public and the environment. Due to its characteristics, the waste of health services deserves special mention as its classification, segregation, packaging, transport, collection, storage and final arrangement. The present study aimed to describe the Waste Management of Health Services (RSS) at two reference hospitals in Bico do Papagaio micro-region, Tocantins, in order to evaluate the adequacy of them to Resolution RDC 306/2004 of the Sanitary Surveillance National Agency (ANVISA). Therefore, to achieve the proposed objective, a questionnaire was applied in the two hospitals to identify how waste management is carried out, highlighting the importance of PGRSS for better management of RSS, emphasize the importance of biosecurity measures on the use of personal protection equipment (PPE), employee training and notification of occupational accidents related to the handling of RSS. Given the results, we found some negative aspects related to the management of RSS in the studied hospitals because they own the PGRSS, and not normally perform it, which is a failure the noncompliance with the relevant legislation. Moreover, one of them has not been approved by relevant municipal and state agency, and none of them is supported by the Secretaries of Administration, Environment and Health, which would be essential as the inappropriate management of RSS can be harmful to the environment, public health and especially to those involved in the handling of these wastes. Therefore, it is concluded that the practice adopted by the two studied health facilities is not adequate and consequently does not meet the relevant resolution to this issue, because the studied health facilities had non-conformities before the established standards by CONAMA 358/2005 and RDC 306/2004 of ANVISA resolutions.

Download PDF: